Super Cushy bike Seats
4 Wheel Drive Sport Utility Vehicles
Nasonex nasal spray
Asics 2080 (1090, 2090, etc... forgot the correct numbers)
all have in common? This is a strech, but these are personal experiences over time which have contributed to my questioning of "conventional wisdom"
As I said in my last post, I finally got around to reading Born to Run by Christopher McDougal. And as I said before, my response to it was "Yeah, I kind of figured some of that out on my own...... the hard way" This post is dedicated to why I agree with a lot of what the book says.
So here it goes.......
Years ago, I was a bicycle mechanic in Chicago. One of my favorite jobs. Did some selling too, but had to know a lot about all of the products in the store.
At that time in the early 90's, manufacturers began making bike seats which kind of looked like sofas on a post. People went gaga over them. "how soft and comfortable they are" people would say. Everyone wanted them, except for people who actually rode their bikes any significant amount of miles.
The problem was, the seats were horrible. They allowed you to be comfortable, but not in the proper fit for riding. I never saw a serious rider use one. In fact, we all had very narrow, lite, minimalist saddles. If you were fit properly to the saddle (seat) and bicycle, it was actually more comfortable to use a high quality saddle which looked small and uncomfortable, especially if you were going over 20-30 miles.
But the bike revolution was being fueled by the mom and dad who want to go on a 3 mile bike ride with their kids. Thus, the saddles stuck around. But they suck. People still think they are great.
The premise was to give give comfort and solve a problem which really did not exist. People were not comfortbale on their saddles due to many factors. The public saw a cushy seat, and figured they must be comfortable. Add to that the evolution of "Cross Bikes" where the handle bars were higher and allowed the rider to ride upright instead of bent over. In the upright position, all of the weight would land on the lower back, and less power would transfer forward.
People switched to bad form as a result of a "better seat"
4 Wheel Drive
Another job I had in the 90's was selling cars. Yes, I was a car salesman. I have since hung up my polyester suits, white belts, and plaid coats. At that time, 4 wheel drive was becoming fashionable. Everybody seemed to want it (mind you, this was in Los Angeles) and was willing to pay for it. I would ask "do you intend to go off road?" And the answer was always "No, but at least I know I can". 4 wheel drive allowed these people to do crazy things with their cars if they wnated to..... but they never did. The car costed more, it was heavier, and they didn't understand what 4 wheel drive actually did.
I saw early on many bad drivers thinking that this would be a good car for them because it was "safer" because it was "bigger" and the 4 wheel drive somehow gave them better traction and was safer as a result. 4 wheel drive should not be used on dry pavement, and can actually be dangerous to do so in certain cases, but people had in their mind that it was safe. I surmised that many accidents would come over the years due to idiots not knowing how to drive large vehicles. They gained a false sense of security with their 4 wheel drive (for no reason), and never improved their driving skills.
Like the bike seat, they did not focus on the core of their problem - they were bad drivers. Safety lies in you, supplemented by your vehicle.
4 wheel drive is great for what it is intended for, but become something everybody "needed", when they did not need it.
I spent 14 years with one company, which will go nameless. The company was good to me, and I learned a ton in my time there. But I grew to dislike my job, and became not so hot on the company. Stress was the main component in my life, and I grew to dread going to work.
During those later years, I would get sick 2-3 times per year. It was more of a cold, lots of congestion, and would beat me down for weeks. It always happened during the Spring and Fall. I was CONVINCED I had allergies. I saw a couple of allergy doctors, got tested for tons of allergies (was pricked all over my back), and begged them to find out what I was allergic to.
"How is that possible?", I asked. They responded by saying it could be something they don't test for, but most likely I just get colds.
Multiple doctors recommended taking a steroidal nasal spray, like Nasonex, as this would allow me to function while my body recovered. They said I should use it continually... like, year round. What?
Now, I have nothing against Nasonex. I am sure it is great at what it does and what it is intended to do, but it was the wrong solution for me. It was a small bandaid on a large problem. I had a hard time believing taking a perscription nasal spray "drug" indefinitely was a solution. I didn't buy it.
Did it work? I don't know. I eventually got better and stopped using it, but I don't know if it speeded recovery.
Eventually, I left the company I was working for. Funny thing happened.... I stopped getting sick. I have not been sick like that for 4 YEARS! Did the job make me sick? Kind of.
I got sick in the Spring and Fall.... peak training times for, at that time in my life, marathons. I exceeded my load factor. Stress + Dumb hard core training + basic anxiety I was having at the time = inexplainable colds. I am 100% convinced of it, but can not prove it as this is purely anecdotal.
Phillip Maffetone writes about inflamation in your body caused by stress and physical activity. When I read this, I thought he was speaking to me. The stress was the killer, the miles pushed me over the limit. 2 years later I was running 70-80 miles per week, and not getting sick. I was stressed, but in a different way. I was not over the limit.
The doctors who perscribed Nasonex for me wanted to feel like they were doing something for me. I acknowledge that get that. But this was not the solution to health. It just was a way to jerry-rig me to keep me functioning instead of making me a healthier person.
Asics road shoes
7 years ago I went out for a run the day after I had run a 20 miler. I got 1 mile and could not even walk. I was 3 weeks out from Twin Cities Marathon, and I could not walk.
I went to see my chirpractor, Fred Clary, and he basically told me my knee cap was not in its correct place due to the fact that my quad muscles were pulling it out of place. My quads were not equally developed.
Sit on the ground with your legs straight out in front of you with your toes pointed up. Flex your quads and watch your knee caps. They should stay relatively in the same place. My right one would move far to the right when I would flex.
I told him I probably needed orthodics, really high tech shoes, and probably some other jibberish. Fred responded by saying "You need me to spend a month with you fixing this, then we can talk about all of that other stuff." He fixed me, but said "I can sell you orthodics, but I don't believe in them. They just band-aid problems and can actually make you worse. You just need to wear different shoes".
The shoes I was wearing allowed me to run in a certain way which built my quad muscles in an unbalanced way. I showed him a pair of my old Asics trail shoes and he said "yeah, run on those".
He almost nailed the problem. He got me on the right track and changed my paradigm, but left out a key piece...... My form was causing the problem, the shoe allowed my form to really be screwed up.
I still run on Asics, just the cheap trail shoes sold at Sports Authority for $50. I buy 1-2 pair per year. I get at least 1000 miles off of each pair. I think I have put 1500 on one before I ripped the heels off (Thanks to the Superior Hiking trail).
Born to Run
Read the book, and come to your own conclusions. My takeaway from the book is not that we have to all run barefoot, but that we have lost our primal love for who we are. It is more of a book on humanity, and how running is a conduit to a better world.
Heck, how do you think someone like Steve Q and I could actually get along on the trails and enjoy each others' company? It is because we are both "running people". Outside of that, we are oppososites.
A significant part of the book is dedicated to the quest of finding out how to run properly, and that the modern running shoes has all but destroyed this. I kind of agree with that, but I don't think it fits all people.
Ultrarunning is a lifestyle. It is not something you do to get bragging rights at the water cooler. I know see rookies out on the trails, wearing "Vibram 5 fingers" out tackling ultras. I am guessing these people have been inspired by the book. Problem is, many are 20 -40 lbs (or more) overweight. They are not living the lifestyle. I am not sure what they are doing, but they are not living the lifestyle.
McDougal is very clear in the book how diet and food in general is an essentail component to the success of the people he documented. But I am guessing those words fell on deaf ears and blind eyes.
Through my ups and downs, I somehow try to maintain "the ultra lifestyle". Sometimes successfully, sometimes not. But that is what makes the sport worth it.
Since my days with that company I had spent 14 years at, I have been through many ups and downs. I have been laid off twice, and faced other significant challenges. But the "ultra lifestyle" has given me a foundation of discipline and mental fortitude to endure many things in life.
Were we born to run? Don't have to ask me twice. Heck yeah. It is a lifestyle.